Telecom Report 2007-05-23
From TEITAC
DRAFT AS OF 5.23.2007 from T/Comm Working Group. In Progress
| Current provision | Keep current language? | Change in jurisdiction? | Modification | Rationale: Why is this change suggested? | Economic Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| xxxxx | New section | no | In complying with this subpart, each agency shall:
| ||
| 1194.23(a) | no | no | (a) Telecommunications terminals and other terminals capable of providing real-time voice communications which do not themselves provide TTY or other real-time text conversation functionality shall comply with the following:
| CAPtel issue uses modem protocol not recognized by IP gateways. Proprietary transport protocol. Use of CAPtel in govt. is the problem. Agrmt does not need to be addressed.
Incoming text on screen can be supported, but to support another text stream wld be challenge. Need a definition for terminal device. These are suggestions. For cellphone, New s/w needed to rd text as you go. Add’l to current phone s/w Yes. Trade off w/ tty to head phone prblm, connector on side. Allows IP phones to be vco/hco enabled. | Cheaper, easier to do than hardware to t/c products. |
| xxxxx | [new] | n/a | (x) The user interface of IP terminals that provide real-time voice communication shall meet the following provisions:
| ||
| 1194.23(b) | no | no | Products that provide real-time conversation text functionality shall do so in the standard format that is supported for that transport medium.
| Push to talk that does not connect to PSTN is not covered.
These reqmts apply to the Gateways to insure interoperablity. This function is not supported by majority of gateways owned by govt. today. Anyone with a closed system falls under (c). This is about insuring interoperability between mine and yours. s/w is available over the air; reqmt is for gateway vendor to support this. | There is a concern among some in industry that reference to specific standards that are proprietary and in early implementation development is premature. There are also many variations of SIP. |
| xxxx | [new] | n/a | (x) Systems that support real-time voice communication shall support at least one standard (for the system) means for real time text communication that is supported by all terminal, router, gateway and other products on that system, and that meets the following requirements:
| Assume high level of understanding by procurement offcr.
“system as delivered must be reliable” shld be: System as purchased should use a reliable text transport format. | |
| 1194.23(c) | no | no | (c) Voice mail, messaging, auto-attendant, and interactive voice response telecommunications systems shall:
| May require s/w in product.
Set-up issue. | This is about use of system, implementation, not the equipment. This is a provision for set-up.
Provisions for product. Provisions for set up.
Based on committee members’ opinion; not backed by research. |
| 1194.23(d) | yes | no | (d) Voice mail, messaging, auto-attendant, and interactive voice response telecommunications systems that require a response from a user within a time interval, shall give an alert when the time interval is about to run out, and shall provide sufficient time for the user to indicate more time is required. | n/a | 0 |
| 1194.23(e) | no | no | (e) Where provided, visual interfaces for telecommunications status information such as caller identification and similar telecommunications functions as part of interactive voice response systems or equivalents shall also be available for users of TTYs or other text conversation systems, and for users who cannot see displays and shall meet all accessibility provisions for software and content. | Issue: Does mute have to be its own button, not a function softkey? | |
| 1194.23(f) | no | no | (f) For receive transmitted voice signals,
| We need to decide how to address the difference between the gain level in HAC and 508. Do we want to differentiate between line-powered products and externally powered? We need to decide on a gain level.
1* There is a problem is measurement of gain from variable floor. Recommend standard for the floor from which the adjustable gain is measured by developed by TIA. | |
| 1194.23(g) | no | no | (g) If the telecommunications product allows a user to adjust the receive volume, a function shall be provided to automatically reset the volume to a safe level after every use if the volume is capable of greater than 18 dB of gain along with an option for user override of that automatic default. | Is there a need to have a max output specified to prevent the gain from exceeding that level?
What is floor? JOHN COOMBS, CISCO…. IMPT. TO SET FLOOR, MSMT OF FLOOR. ALSO WILL HAVE TO SET MSMT FOR DISTORTION. Conform w/ FCC, drop reset if 18 dB and est. common floor measurement. Est’g common floor so can have a real 18 dB. Distortion – Matt Bakke. | |
| 1194.23(h) | no | no | (h) Where a telecommunications product delivers output by an audio transducer which is normally held up to the ear, a means for effective magnetic wireless coupling to hearing technologies shall be provided that allows the user of such technologies to effectively utilize the telecommunication product. This guideline shall apply to wireless, wireline, cordless and Bluetooth ?? applications. | ||
| 1194.23(i) | yes | no | (i) Interference to hearing technologies (including hearing aids, cochlear implants, and assistive listening devices) shall be reduced to the lowest possible level that allows a user of hearing technologies to utilize the telecommunications product. | Should metrics be added like the TIA cordless standards? Or a reference to ANSI/IEEE? Or other standards?
Do we want to reference FCC regs for wireless technologies? | |
| 1194.23(j) | yes | no | (j) Products that transmit or conduct information or communication shall pass through cross-manufacturer, non-proprietary, industry-standard codes, translation protocols, formats or other information necessary to provide the information or communication in a usable format. Technologies which use encoding, signal compression, format transformation, or similar techniques shall not remove information needed for access or shall restore it upon delivery. Firewalls, routers, gateways and other products that pass real-time voice communication shall also pass real-time text communication signals (including mixed voice & real-time text) that are standard for that technology platform without distortion or error beyond 1%.
NOTE: Only phones that are passing text signals onto another device, e.g. TTY, would be subject to this provision. | Proposed. Better than old but needs work.
Don’t want to do Bell 103 and 202. Concern: What if passing voice but need to translate text? Want to take 4103 and put it own format for closed network. | |
| 1194.24(k) | [new] | (k) Telecommunications products or systems which have the capacity to transmit video, text and voice communications shall support internet protocol text and voice communications in X format and have sufficient transmission bandwidth capacity to support video communication such as video relay and point to point video communications. | What did we decide to do about firewall problems? | ||
| 1194.24(k) | yes |
| Moved to Hardware |
New Provisions
| New Provision | Rationale — What issue does this provision address? | Estimated Economic Impact |
|---|---|---|
| The van der Heiden PROPOSAL: – 4.13.07 [(1) through (4)]] | ||
| (1)Wherever voice is passed through real-time text is passed through Firewalls, gateways and other products that pass real-time voice conversation signals shall also pass real-time text conversation signals (including mixed voice & real-time text) that are standard for that medium without distortion or error beyond 1%. | Address devices that pass voice not with phones or other terminal devices. | Industry Comment: Econ. Implications for elements not clear or understood, e.g. network, terminal device, client software, etc. What are standards, what development needs to be done, is unknown. Time line interdependencies unknown. |
| (2) Real-time text support is in standard form (for that technology)
Products that provide real-time conversation text functionality shall do so in the standard format that is supported for that transport medium.
| Allows Skype, PBXs, and other closed systems to use whatever for internal text transport and for transport between and within their own systems. When and if connect to the PSTN or Public SIP, then these products need to convert to the public formats at that point only. They are still free to use other formats but they must support public formats to guarantee that they can interface with other equipment at the far end of the public network call.
TIA Comment: Premature to specify a protocol standard for text. RFC 4103 separates voice and data ports; has unique characteristics. | Interop testing necessary at end points. Significant costs. |
(3) Voice communication systems support a standard (for the system) real-time text that meets the following:
| Provides specifications for text transport. Although closed systems can use any technology to transport text, the systems must meet these reliability specifications. TTY and RFC 4103 can already meet these specifications. | |
(4) If voice devices are capable of supporting text display or creation they allow their use for Real-time Text.
| Last item in (4) — equivalent to TTY today — but would open it up for other technologies and systems.
This says if the device can display text, then it should display real-time text that is sent to it. If it can generate text, it should allow users to send real-time text. If it can’t do both, then there should be a method for connecting a device that can and that device should be allowed to work (permission). | |
(5) If voice devices are capable of supporting video then support sign language.
| If the system technically can be used for sign language, users should be able to use it for such.
Offered by T. Brett to address network mngmt reluctance to open further ports in the agency’s firewall. Not required for every employee. | |
Tobias Contribution:
| These are from GetHuman.com and address IVRs. Very service centric, not hardware. |
Other Material
- Recommendations on organization of the provisions
- Issues this subcommittee is not addressing, but which should be addressed.
- Recommendations relating to Themes or other content
- Recommendations regarding process: the work of the subcommittees, the whole Committee, liaison with the Access Board, etc.
